<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" ><channel><title>Social Media Examiner | Twitter does work for business, despite what the WSJ might report. | Topic Replies</title> <atom:link href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/twitter-does-work-for-business-despite-what-the-wsj-might-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/twitter-does-work-for-business-despite-what-the-wsj-might-report/feed/</link> <description>Twitter does work for business, despite what the WSJ might report. - Forum Topic in the Group Small Business</description> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:47:20 +0000</pubDate> <generator>http://buddypress.org/?v=1.5.5</generator> <language>en</language> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/twitter-does-work-for-business-despite-what-the-wsj-might-report/#post-50927</guid><title><![CDATA[E N Brown replied to the forum topic Twitter does work for business, despite what the WSJ might report. in the club Small Business]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/twitter-does-work-for-business-despite-what-the-wsj-might-report/#post-50927</link> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:43:37 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/supereb/" title="E N Brown" rel="nofollow">E N Brown</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/twitter-does-work-for-business-despite-what-the-wsj-might-report/" rel="nofollow">Twitter does work for business, despite what the WSJ might report.</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/" rel="nofollow">Small Business</a> HI &#160;<a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/jon-hartley/' rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/jon-hartley/' rel="nofollow">@jon-hartley</a> ---<div></div><div></div><div>Sometimes people write twaddle because they can. &#160;835 companies filling out a questionnaire does not make the compilation of the answers a "trend" anymore than a pig farmer can tell a sheep [&#8230;]</div> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/twitter-does-work-for-business-despite-what-the-wsj-might-report/#post-50917</guid><title><![CDATA[Rich Brooks replied to the forum topic Twitter does work for business, despite what the WSJ might report. in the club Small Business]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/twitter-does-work-for-business-despite-what-the-wsj-might-report/#post-50917</link> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:13:47 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/rich-brooks/" title="Rich Brooks" rel="nofollow">Rich Brooks</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/twitter-does-work-for-business-despite-what-the-wsj-might-report/" rel="nofollow">Twitter does work for business, despite what the WSJ might report.</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/" rel="nofollow">Small Business</a> <a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/jon-hartley/' rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/jon-hartley/' rel="nofollow">@jon-hartley</a><div></div><div>Agreed that the article title sounds more geared to sell papers than educate.</div><div></div><div>You also have to wonder if the business interviewed just don't "get" twitter. How much time are they putting in? What [&#8230;]</div> ]]> </description> </item> </channel> </rss>