SEO Pricing Survey Results (12 posts)

Topic tags: pricing, SEO
  • Hi SME World, 

    SEOmoz surveyed 600+ SEO firms r.e. their pricing models, I figured it could be of some use to the community. So basically rates vary, fixed price for projects is most common. Does this support what you see in the social media world? Are you guys charging a monthly retainer fee? 

    Key findings are:

    1. Hourly SEO Costs Vary Across Countries, but $76-$200/hour is Most Common
      With the exception of India (the only developing region that was well-represented in our survey), hourly costs of $76-$200 (representing three responses) covered 50%+ of all firms. It was highest in Australia/New Zealand at 62%, followed by 58.1% in the US and 56% in Canada. Granted, this is a wide range, but it provides the answer to a frequently-asked question from those seeking SEO services for the first time.
      _
    2. By-the-Project Pricing is Popular and Most Commonly $1,000-$7,500
      70.1% of respondents said they offer project-based pricing (the most common pricing system selected in the survey). 43% of consultancies were represented by the four price ranges: $1,001-$1,500, $1,501-$2,500, $2501-$5,000 and $5,001-$7,500. Obviously, there’s a wide variety of prices here, not surprising given that the types of projects offered may be quite diverse. 
      _
    3. Monthly Retainer Pricing Has the Widest Distribution
      While both hourly and by-the-project rates do have a wide range of pricing, monthly retainers are certainly the most distributed of the price questions asked in our survey. The two most common were $251-$500/month (13.8%) and $2,501-$5,000/month (11.3%).
    Best,

  • @robpeck

    #3 is the one I see the most. It’s less messy and more measurable. And, it’s easier to manage cash flow for the seo company and budget for the company needing the work.

  • @donpurdum Agree with all of your points. It’s also the most work though! We’ve been experimenting with different models. You definitely have to put out the best product/strategy wearing the consultant (as opposed to hourly hat). I’ve seen the happiest clients with the tightly defined project business, but the upside is limited. 

    Growing into the retainer/consultancy model. I like it.  

  • The retainer/consultancy model looks quite appealing, to say the least. Although it may sometimes be more demanding as far as setting up a situation with frequent clientel.

  • @robpeck definitely. Your conclusion is right re. prices. As far as it is concerned with india, here are still very big variation in different parts of the country. Unfortunately, here, there is no fix formula. Prices are fixed by weighing client’s capacity and project size etc. but no uniformity in terms of countrywide price formula.

  • @moinshaikh 

    Where are you in India? I’m in Chennai for the time being. I’ve also noticed “how much do we want this client” plays a much larger role in India i.e. if it is a known consumer brand we may reduce rates to get the deal. 

    Best,  

  • @robpeck in ahmedabad (gujarat)

  • Always cool to find people in India, my daughter and her husband (Americans) are teaching at Woodstock Academy in Mussourie north of Delhi @robpeck @moinshaikh

  • @deairby glad to know that! Always Love to connect with people from different part of world depicting different culture, values and of course knowledge!

  • @deairby @moinshaikh I rarely get up north, but am planning on going to adTech next month, anyone going?

  • @robpeck good to know that! But i am busy in hiring process right now so i don’t think i will be able to be there. Though i will keep an eye on the event, and wish you all the best for the successful trip.

  • Thanks for sharing that seo pricing survey data @robpeck

    I think context is more important than the actual price breakdowns. If you set clear business goals with the seo expert and are measuring and tracking progress—not just vanity numbers but things of actual value to making business decisions, then a “good” price is going to reveal itself. 

    If you have a basic site, clear cut goals and minimal changes, then I can see $500 per month being reasonable. But I’d gauge that on the connection between increase traffic from organic search and number of keyword terms bringing traffic and if you’re making $501+ per month from that traffic. Spend money to make money, as long as you’re spending less than you’re making. 

    If you don’t know if the seo is working, then you have a crappy seo expert and you better move on, regardless of how nicely formatted the reports might be. Pay for the outcome, not the fancy reception area or glossy reports with line graphs going up.


Add your voice to the discussion

Existing members: . If you do not have a SME account, .