<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" ><channel><title>Social Media Examiner | Google+ -vs- Blogging | Topic Replies</title> <atom:link href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging/feed/</link> <description>Google+ -vs- Blogging - Forum Topic in the Group Small Business</description> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:59:24 +0000</pubDate> <generator>http://buddypress.org/?v=1.5.5</generator> <language>en</language> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging/#post-35789</guid><title><![CDATA[Laura Christianson, Blogging Bistro replied to the forum topic Google+ -vs- Blogging in the club Small Business]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging/#post-35789</link> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 05:35:57 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/laurachristianson/" title="Laura Christianson, Blogging Bistro" rel="nofollow">Laura Christianson, Blogging Bistro</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging/" rel="nofollow">Google+ -vs- Blogging</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/" rel="nofollow">Small Business</a> Totally agree with Rich <a class="mention" href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/rich-brooks/" title="Mention Rich Brooks" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/rich-brooks/' rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/rich-brooks/' rel="nofollow">@rich-brooks</a>. Your blog gives you a long-term, "googleable" presence on the web. Google+ gives you a short-term opportunity to engage in discussions, but it's more of a "here today, [&#8230;]</p> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging/#post-35489</guid><title><![CDATA[Dea Irby replied to the forum topic Google+ -vs- Blogging in the club Small Business]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging/#post-35489</link> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 17:34:23 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/deairby/" title="Dea Irby" rel="nofollow">Dea Irby</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging/" rel="nofollow">Google+ -vs- Blogging</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/" rel="nofollow">Small Business</a> I agree with Rich! Google+ should supplement not replace. Great question to raise, Becky. <a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/beckyflansburg/' rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/beckyflansburg/' rel="nofollow">@beckyflansburg</a> <a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/rich-brooks/' rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/rich-brooks/' rel="nofollow">@rich-brooks</a></p> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging/#post-35483</guid><title><![CDATA[Becky Flansburg-Virtual Assistant Services replied to the forum topic Google+ -vs- Blogging in the club Small Business]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging/#post-35483</link> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 16:52:30 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/beckyflansburg/" title="Becky Flansburg-Virtual Assistant Services" rel="nofollow">Becky Flansburg-Virtual Assistant Services</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging/" rel="nofollow">Google+ -vs- Blogging</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/" rel="nofollow">Small Business</a> EXCELLENT response <a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/rich-brooks/' rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/rich-brooks/' rel="nofollow">@rich-brooks</a>! I think just because "it's Google" people think it will be around forever. You raise a very good point about all content going bub-bye if Google+ disappears. Thanks so much.</p> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging/#post-35476</guid><title><![CDATA[Rich Brooks replied to the forum topic Google+ -vs- Blogging in the club Small Business]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging/#post-35476</link> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:51:54 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/rich-brooks/" title="Rich Brooks" rel="nofollow">Rich Brooks</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging/" rel="nofollow">Google+ -vs- Blogging</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/small-business/" rel="nofollow">Small Business</a> <a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/beckyflansburg/' rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/beckyflansburg/' rel="nofollow">@beckyflansburg</a><div></div><div>I would suggest that's a terrible idea. G+ should SUPPLEMENT your blog, not replace it.</div><div></div><div>What if G+ goes under next year? Where all your content then?</div><div></div><div>What? You say. Google would never let G+ [&#8230;]</div> ]]> </description> </item> </channel> </rss>