Can technology replace the human element in Experiential Marketing? (17 posts)

  • Do you think that online marketing will ever completely replace the physical branding / promotional activities and become the only experiential marketing medium? Having asked this question, do you think that the current online marketing is engaging enough to be classified experiential?

  • @eddysleiman Thanks for asking such an intriguing question. I don’t think you can ever replace the human need to experience life with all 5 of our senses. Virtual marketing can only influence sight and sound and so will always feel incomplete. That said–having just returned from a physical conference–it is entirely possible to develop significant relationships with people through virtual technologies. I enjoyed meeting people face-to-face that I had only known virtually.

    The reality is that most of us have relationships with people around the world whom we may never meet in person. If that is true, then technology can help brands build relationships with people that are lasting, real and authentic. But I think it has to be people-to-people, not brand-to-people. 

  • @phil-mershon So you believe that there will be no memorable experience between a person and a brand when relying on technology?! since a people to people experience will make the person memorable and rarely the brand.Your thoughts!

  • I agree with you  @eddysleiman

  • @eddysleiman I think it depends a lot on your terms. I think technology can create memorable experiences, but they will only live in our short-term memories. People inside a brand can use technology to create that lasting connection and experience. People feel loyalty to people, not brands or technology or anything else deemed impersonal.

    What’s your goal in this conversation?

  • @phil-mershon Nothing more then seeing and knowing the different perceptions that individuals have. We are in a world where everything is heading towards the digital arena, so I thought it would be good to see how far people believe it can go.

    I agree with you that the human factor can never be replaced I would add however that the impressions that we can create through the experiential activities can never be achieved through technology and will never be as memorable. 

    I understand your point about the whole loyalty of people to people but as marketers what we seek is a brand loyalty so I would disagree with you a bit on that point.

  • @phil-mershon I agree that a person-to-person relationship is always going to matter – we’re social creatures, after all, and we like to be in the company of others. We can definitely have meaningful online/virtual partnerships/relationships, but we’ll always welcome the chance to shake someone’s hand that we already “know” but have never “met” before.

    @eddysleiman while we marketers may seek brand loyalty, quite often the loyalty is going to go with the person at that business that you have a relationship with, not the corporation. Manufacturer’s reps cultivate relationships with individual salespeople because they know that if that person goes to another business, that may very well be a foot in a new door. I love the staff at my local bank, however I can’t stand the policies of the mega-corporation they work for, and am transitioning my business away.

    That being said, I think that technology can be used to entertain, inform, assist and educate customers in many of the same ways traditional marketing can. I mean, an online game that rewards players with upgrades and points that can be redeemed for merchandise is no different than collecting can tabs for that same branded merchandise…

  • @reneestpeter   I like your argument Renée. I would like to go back to something you said “Quite often the loyalty is going to go with the person …” I personally do not completely agree with you although I know exactly what you mean since I have personally experienced something similar. But in my own thinking and believes; Marketers’ job is to achieve a brand loyalty that encompass the person or the individual in the middle other way said “do not let the loyalty be vulnerable because of a person”
    I like the online game example you have used but I believe that there is no more you can do in a digital world. whatever solution you are going to come up with it won’t have a deep impact unless you have added a physical engagement to it @phil-mershon

  • I don’t believe that online marketing will replace branding / marketing and become the only experiential medium?   Whatever is most effective for a given audience and location will determine which approach (or combination of approaches)  is most effective.  We are digitally oriented today – but at some point the newness will wear down and we will better understand its limitations.   
    To your second question (do you think that the current online marketing is engaging enough to be classified experiential?)  I’m not sure.   Our mindset when we are on the web is to scan.   Will we slow down on the web and really engage with content?    I think it depends.  If I love a given topic,  and I believe I can gain extremely helpful knowledge that I can apply and see results –  I think the answer would us.     

    Regards, David Strategy-Keys.com 

  • People talk about how Apple has branded because of the “Apple Experience” when you go to the store.  I disagree.  I think people go to the store because of what they’ve learned online, on TV, thru friends….People are perfectly happy buying their Apple products online.   Apple built a great product and stayed ahead of the market – you might even say they created the market.   People are not looking for a personal experience with a brand- they are looking for a good product and brands need to remember that they have to build a better mousetrap and then make sure that everyone knows about it – thru all media – online, TV, in print and with storefronts.  The “personal touch” or in person or whatever is just another avenue – no one wants to market with just one method because different marketing approaches appeal  to different audiences.  Multiple methods are better and will always be necessary – which methods you choose depends somewhat on your market.  You probably want to go to a bakery to make a purchasing decision, but don’t need to do to buy a book or computer.  This is getting too long…sorry…….

  • @ndonelly I am sorry mate but I absolutely disagree with you especially that you have named Apple as an example. Apple is one of the very well known brands that has communicated its identity and positioned it in the consumers minds through communication mediums / tools. But when you talk iphone, ipad, even itune you talk Apple and people gets them because they are Apple and not otherwise….am not being subjective or defensive over Apple but people do frequent their store just for an Apple Experience or let’s say 85% does and will give you the credit of the 15% :-) I vote for David  @dwillden and will repeat his quote “We are digitally oriented today – but at some point the newness will wear down and we will better understand its limitations.” Cheers!

  • I specifically chose Apple because of that whole “Apple Experience” thing. and because everyone uses them as an example of the branding market – yes they have branded well.  Yes they have marketed well.  People want the product and they don’t care if they buy it online or at the store.  Their non-store sales far exceed their instore sales.

  • People do business with  those they know like and trust! It is a natural progression the same hold true for businesses / brands, if one can create a know you like you trust you feeling from just digital media then they could replace the human element. 

    I have yet to see any company or person do this, there are many thing that just need the human touch in order for the comfort level to go high enough for any real locality to occur. ( price hicks major changes to product or services to be a few).

    Personally I never just go on line to purchase a product or service, unless the price is at or below a certain price point,after that seeing the product or service along with talking to staff, most likely visiting, playing with product, along with getting a good sense if I want to deal with those I will need on my team is a MUST.   Once the above  has been accomplished to my satisfaction on line buying to additional products or services is not an issue, other wise to me it is like putting the cart before the horse.
     Could I be the only one who feel this way?

    David

  • @davidhebert

    We are more or less on the same page David. For me experiential marketing will always be around the existence of the physical element that is presented by humans to make it memorable.

    Digital / online experience will never make something memorable “for me” it can be nice, it can be neat, it can be original but will never be memorable.

    Cheers!

  • I have been in business for the past 15 years and have had the privilege to work in different industries, countries and methodologies due to the need of adapting my methods in compliance with the wide variety of clients I had to deal with.

    I have found that the difference between Online & person to person business is just in the numbers. It is possible to achieve a nearly 100% closing rate on a person to person method of marketing if done with proper insight & experience. However the volume of sales is limited. Online Marketing targets exponential volumes and depending on sight & experience, the closing rate can still never match person to person marketing. However, the volume of sales can far exceed any possible alternative method.

    As an example, I was able to consistently sell an average of 20 Houses a month in my Real estate Business (& of course made a reasonable profit). However I could not exceed that volume personally without sacrificing my free time and lifestyle. However, in my online Marketing business, I am able to spend the fraction of time that I used in my real estate business & still earn exponentially more than I ever could before.

    The reason people are reluctant to get into online business is due to increased challenges that need to be overcome to be successful in this medium. Major Corporations are forced to utilize traditional methods due to current market conditions. However Online business is fast growing and with reasonable certainty, has a growing role in all people’s lives.

    Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:”"; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;}I am promoting Online Business Skills and offering a complimentary 563 page comprehensive manual on Online Business Marketing. If you would like a free copy, please send me a request to my email: osman@intertradefour.com

    Osman

  • I have been in business for the past 15 years and have had the privilege to work in different industries, countries and methodologies due to the need of adapting my methods in compliance with the wide variety of clients I had to deal with.

    I have found that the difference between Online & person to person business is just in the numbers. It is possible to achieve a nearly 100% closing rate on a person to person method of marketing if done with proper insight & experience. However the volume of sales is limited. Online Marketing targets exponential volumes and depending on sight & experience, the closing rate can still never match person to person marketing. However, the volume of sales can far exceed any possible alternative method.

    As an example, I was able to consistently sell an average of 20 Houses a month in my Real estate Business (& of course made a reasonable profit). However I could not exceed that volume personally without sacrificing my free time and lifestyle. However, in my online Marketing business, I am able to spend the fraction of time that I used in my real estate business & still earn exponentially more than I ever could before.

    The reason people are reluctant to get into online business is due to increased challenges that need to be overcome to be successful in this medium. Major Corporations are forced to utilize traditional methods due to current market conditions. However Online business is fast growing and with reasonable certainty, has a growing role in all people’s lives.

    Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:”"; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;}I am promoting Online Business Skills and offering a complimentary 563 page comprehensive manual on Online Business Marketing. If you would like a free copy, please send me a request to my email: osman@intertradefour.com

    Osman

  • @osmanamg

    Thank you for the feedback Osman. In my opinion you are generalizing a bit. we all know that the solution you are talking about differs from a market to another, form a brand or service to another.

    If anyone has a different opinion please let’s discuss it


Add your voice to the discussion

Existing members: . If you do not have a SME account, .