<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" ><channel><title>Social Media Examiner | Facebook Reach  | Topic Replies</title> <atom:link href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/facebook/forum/topic/facebook-reach-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/facebook/forum/topic/facebook-reach-1/feed/</link> <description>Facebook Reach  - Forum Topic in the Group Facebook</description> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:57:55 +0000</pubDate> <generator>http://buddypress.org/?v=1.5.5</generator> <language>en</language> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/facebook/forum/topic/facebook-reach-1/#post-45461</guid><title><![CDATA[Kenneth Golden replied to the forum topic Facebook Reach  in the club Facebook]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/facebook/forum/topic/facebook-reach-1/#post-45461</link> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 11:24:25 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/klg007/" title="Kenneth Golden" rel="nofollow">Kenneth Golden</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/facebook/forum/topic/facebook-reach-1/" rel="nofollow">Facebook Reach </a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/facebook/" rel="nofollow">Facebook</a> Yes! I noticed the change right after Facebook went public. Totally different policies come into play when events of this type take place. However, upper management prefers that these policy changes be implemented [&#8230;]</p> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/facebook/forum/topic/facebook-reach-1/#post-45358</guid><title><![CDATA[Ann at  greenoak replied to the forum topic Facebook Reach  in the club Facebook]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/facebook/forum/topic/facebook-reach-1/#post-45358</link> <pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 13:09:48 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/annfurnivall/" title="Ann at  greenoak" rel="nofollow">Ann at  greenoak</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/facebook/forum/topic/facebook-reach-1" rel="nofollow">Facebook Reach </a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/facebook/" rel="nofollow">Facebook</a> <a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/andrea-vahl/' rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/andrea-vahl/' rel="nofollow">@andrea-vahl</a> thats a neat&#160; thread&#160; ....and&#160; so wierd&#160; that&#160;&#160; some arent&#160;&#160; having this issue......but&#160; nice&#160; to&#160; know it isnt just a&#160; few who are&#160; having&#160;&#160; huge downturn on&#160; pictures.......&#160;&#160;but&#160; what to do?&#160; no&#160;&#160; [&#8230;]</p> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/facebook/forum/topic/facebook-reach-1/#post-45345</guid><title><![CDATA[Dawn Chitwood replied to the forum topic Facebook Reach  in the club Facebook]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/facebook/forum/topic/facebook-reach-1/#post-45345</link> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 23:03:09 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/dawnchitwoodrivers/" title="Dawn Chitwood" rel="nofollow">Dawn Chitwood</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/facebook/forum/topic/facebook-reach-1/" rel="nofollow">Facebook Reach </a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/facebook/" rel="nofollow">Facebook</a> This is interesting! I have yet to notice this, but will certainly be paying attention now. It is a curious change. I guess it keeps us on our toes trying to keep up with the latest.</p> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/facebook/forum/topic/facebook-reach-1/#post-45333</guid><title><![CDATA[Andrea Vahl replied to the forum topic Facebook Reach  in the club Facebook]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/facebook/forum/topic/facebook-reach-1/#post-45333</link> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 19:47:27 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/andrea-vahl/" title="Andrea Vahl" rel="nofollow">Andrea Vahl</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/facebook/forum/topic/facebook-reach-1/" rel="nofollow">Facebook Reach </a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/facebook/" rel="nofollow">Facebook</a> We are seeing mixed reports on this, <a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/louisteoh/' rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/louisteoh/' rel="nofollow">@louisteoh</a> but many people are seeing the same thing.&#160; On Social Media Examiner we are seeing anywhere between 3-7 times as high Reach numbers for text only posts.&#160; That [&#8230;]</p> ]]> </description> </item> </channel> </rss>