Using Politics in Blogs (17 posts)

Topic tags: content, topics
  • Good Evening Everyone!

    It’s the political season here in the US and the first Presidential debate took place last night. Regardless of a person’s political persuasion, there were lessons that came out of that debate that made for a really good blog post. However, when I ran it past “The Big Guy” (my husband, my sounding board and MY second set of eyes), his reaction was “it’s good, well written, you managed to present a balanced perspective that helped make your point, but … it includes politics … better to kill it and write something else”.

    So my question is this … is using politics in a blog (that’s not necessarily geared towards that subject matter) to illustrate a point bad form, too risky or is it a viable illustrative tool? Opinions?

  • @atediting I think it depends on the makeup of your visitors, what do they have interests in, they may quite appreciate your perspective, I think it would not be suitable for an email list, might cause people to unsubscribe. If you post it and upset people you may decide to remove it after a few days…. I don’t see a problem with a fair article.

  • @atediting I’ve seen lots of articles on how politicians are using social media, advertising campaigns, etc. just like they would write about the lessons you could learn (or not) from a business. I would think if you’re just strictly writing about lessons you could learn from them that had nothing to do with their actual stances on particular issues, you might be OK. Just be prepared for people who are passionate about one candidate over the other to potentially get a little heated reading that the opponent did something right – even if they did. :)

  • I think it depends on your tone … if you stay neutral, professional and positive, I think it’s OK to proceed. It’s when people start taking a nasty, one-sided approach that people get offended. I would also try dissuade people from making nasty  comments … maybe disable comments for that one blog post, or ask readers to refrain from making rude comments about candidates since that is not the intention of your blog post.

  • Thanks Dave, Kristi and Kathy! It’s not often that I don’t follow the Big Guy’s advice, but I think I’m going to this time. It’s the perfect illustration for the point I wanted to make. But I am going to follow Kathy’s suggestion and put a disclaimer at the bottom. I’m not sure it will do any good – it’s a touchy topic – but, then again, maybe using it will also spice things up enough to get people involved. :)   Thanks again!

  • This political season is so polarized that it is difficult, no matter how you try, to not rub some folks the wrong way.  Even if you are not trying to be political and only using the political scene as examples, you risk having negative responses and unsubscribes. 

    The disclaimer is a good idea, but still expect reactions - both good and bad.  Also, if you have a follower who replies in a way that seems positive toward one candidate or the other, you will have further comments from reader with  opposing views and it could become ugly.

    I recommend to monitor your comments closely and edit as needed… you may want to put in your disclaimer that due to the sensitive nature of the topic and in order to maintain the professionalism of the site you will (aggressively) excercise the right to edit any comments deemed inappropriate.

  • Thanks Evelyne!

    I’ll be honest. The blog is new new new … and the first couple posts were more introductory than anything else — which I knew would lead to very little in the way of comments or anything else. This is the first one that has a hook in it that could grab a little attention. We’ll see what, if anything,happens. Thanks again!

  • @atediting I agree with @kristi-hines – I think your blog post could work if you approach it from a “business lessons learned from the debate” kind of perspective. You know, take politics per se out of it.  That way it’s just a frame for your argument and not overtly political. 

    I think having a hook really helps organize the content. It’s your blog, and while of course you don’t want to alienate people intentionally, you should be able to write about what’s meaningful to you there — if people get offended, they may not be your “right people”/ideal audience to anyway.

    This topic is all kinds of interesting to me, because I worked in politics for a number of years, and I’m working on a blog post right now about marketing lessons learned from working in the political trenches.

    Good luck with your post, I’d love to read it once you post it to your blog!


     

  • Thanks @Kimberly-Houston. The going has been slow as far as people checking in but c’est l’vie. :)   It still feels like I’m putting my ‘baby’ out there for everyone to see all the faults … but if you’d like to check it out, it’s at:  http://amythompsonediting.blogspot.com/

  • @atediting Just read your post — loved your key message that “Preparation and knowledge are key to being able to provide the best services possible.” You betcha!  I think you handled the “political” thing very well — I can’t imagine any sane, well-reasoned adult taking offense at anything you said!  : )

  • @Kimberly Houston – thank you! You are actually the first person  I know of who isn’t family, friend or current/former colleague who has taken a look at the page. Your feedback means a lot! :)   It ended up being a lot longer than I had initially planned – but then again, all of the blog entries have so far.

  • @atediting Sorry, Amy, but I don’t agree. As a writer you have 100% control over what you write. But you never have control of how people interpret what you write. And guaranteed, at least 90% of the population is not as smart or thoughtful as you are. The minute you even reference something remotely political — quite literally meaning “many ideas” — you open yourself up to get flashed back into the Wild, Wild West of illiterate, inane, and quite insane responses.

    THEN, people start responding to the responses, misinterpreting your message in bizarre ways, holding you accountable or blaming YOU for things you never said or never meant. 

    It is NEVER okay to interject “politics” or multiple ideas into writings meant for the masses. That is, unless your goal is to generate total chaos, unrest, ill will, and an us against them mentality among your readers. Even if people didn’t comment, many misinterpreted the message. Political campaigns involving particular candidates can never be used as examples if you want to make YOUR message crystal clear. Otherwise, many will always ASSUME you had some kind of private agenda for even mentioning it. They’ll remember that and not forgive you far longer than they’ll remember what your niche or marketing message is. 

    If you’re writing for a client or a boss, it’s the big bad no-no that you NEVER agree to write, unless your writing for a candidate who pays you for the never-ending damage it causes your local writer reputation. That’s why political writers can charge outrageous fees for writing for candidates, as they’re stuck with the fallout long after the election is over.

    Just my two cents… my experienced two cents…

    No matter how innocuous and innocently you interject politics into your writing, inevitably, it is ALWAYS the kiss of death… causes ill will… and insults half your readers… ALWAYS. There is no “little bit” or “they’ll get over it” in these cases. It’s ALWAYS. Politics and marketing do NOT mix. Unless you are selling a candidate, which is what half your readers will always assume, even if you are not.

    Robin Carlisle

  • Amy, Amy, Amy… you just lost half your readership. Romney gets 3 points and Obama, well… doesn’t. You are a Republican. Everything you say is meant as a conservative message. No Democrat will hire you or wants to hear what you have to say. No Democrat will read pass the line where you say Obama, well… Well, what? He lost?

    See what I mean. You named names. You named parties. You picked a fight. You’re message wasn’t heard. You lost. Not them. Your husband was right. How will you market to Democrats now? Pick a fight with Conservatives? Then no one will trust you.

    I’m an old time reporter disgusted with today’s reporters who can’t write without interjecting their own political leanings in whatever they do.

    But you, Amy, are marketing a business… an editing business… of local customers… and perhaps online customers… all who may or may not vote, but all who have some kind of political opinion.

    For anyone to OK your beautiful and thoughtful essay for anything other than a private classroom has not fully thought through the long-term consequences of what you’ve written.

    It doesn’t matter if you think YOU are unbiased. It only matters that within the first few paragraphs you managed to alienate anyone who disagrees with your choice of who “won” or was best prepared.

    This is a great essay to distribute to your Political Science 101 class, but to NO ONE ELSE!

    Future shock, Amy, is now. I would delete this as quickly as you can and hope Google has not yet indexed it… if you want to sell anything and still claim you are unbiased.

    Me? I’m 100% NOT conservative or liberal. I was born a journalist. Not a political writer. Though I, too, made the mistake once of thinking I could “share” an objective piece outside a classroom. I’m advising you not to make that same mistake.

    Your husband was right. Delete it. Quickly.

    Just my opinion… biased or unbiased… objective or not… See how it doesn’t matter when the subject matter or result stirs your emotions? That’s how democrats will read your essay — stabbing them in the heart, insulting them, affronting them, no matter your intent. See how easy it is to misinterpret someone’s writing when you play with people’s emotions and loyalties?

    Don’t go there, Amy. You’re too good a writer for that.

    Robin Carlisle

  • What’s worse… when you click on comments or no comments… you can’t comment… this is what you get instead: Sorry, the page you were looking for in this blog does not exist.

  • Thanks Robin! And thanks for the compliment about the writing — I like to think I’m pretty good but validation never hurts – and it feels good too! :)   I did go ahead and delete the post. I’ll just rework it without using the debate as the illustration (there are plenty of others that can be used).

    Thank you Everyone for your input! It helped a lot and the discussion did open up a definite learning experience for me (and hopefully for others).

  • @Robin – I just went in using another account and the comments on the 2 remaining blog entries worked fine. I wonder if you got that message because I had already deleted it?

  • Amy, you are a wonderful, talented writer! I read your other articles and they are as well-written as your “be prepared” article. So glad you decided to edit out the political examples as your introduction. You will NOT regret your decision. 

    Sorry I had to be soooooo bold. But your talent is too valuable to get blacklisted locally without you ever even knowing it.

    Please forgive me… :)

    And to everyone else, please rethink any advice you give about interjecting politics into a blog that is not a political blog. Do so at your own peril, not at someone else’s, please.

    Robin Carlisle


Add your voice to the discussion

Existing members: . If you do not have a SME account, .

 
 
Check out the Social Media Marketing Podcast!
Get your ad placed here!

Networking Clubs Leaderboard

Avatar ImageE
Ann at  greenoakAnn
Kapil MudholkarKapil
Avatar ImageChris
Avatar ImageJudith
Avatar ImageLydia
Avatar ImageJameson
KMediaIrelandKMediaIrel
Avatar ImageHarry
Avatar ImageAlexandra
Learn more about the Networking Clubs

Recently Active Members

Profile picture of
Catherine Tatum
Moin Shaikh
Profile picture of
Profile picture of
Profile picture of
Eddie Smith
Profile picture of
Profile picture of
Profile picture of
Profile picture of
Profile picture of
Profile picture of
Michael Pingree
Profile picture of