SEO Importance of Domain Extension (.com or .co) (10 posts)

  • @Kristi-hines 

    There is no doubt about the importance of having a .com extension. 

    I am working on a project which contains an important keyword but it’s domain extension is .co.

    Do you have any idea how difficult to get rankings in the search engines in the long run compare to .com extension.

    Thank you for your help. 

  • @rshahbaz The answer to this keeps changing. A year ago, it was difficult, and having keywords in the domain was very important. Now, keywords in the domain are not as important as they used to be, and exact keyword domains is not very effective.

    Whether a .co TLD (top level domain) will rank or not is still up in the air. I haven’t tried it myself, but I’ve been hearing from other people who are getting it to rank with some success.

    How it compares to getting a .com ranked — with all other things being equal — still seems to favor the .com, but that’s only based on anecdotal evidence, not anything I have seen studied. Have you checked SEOMoz.org? They’ll be your best bet.

  • @erikdeckers thank you Erick for your your help.

    I haven’t checked the SEOMoz.org for the answer. I will have a look to see if I can find to the point info there.

    Let’s see what Kristi & other people have to say on this :-)

  • In my experince it’s the code, the page content and the links pointing to the page that affect the ranking, not the TLD.

    There are hundreds of TLDs, with the potential for thousands more now that companies (and well-heeled individuals) can pony up $185,000 and get their own custom “generic TLD.” It’s true that country-specific TLDs may get some sort of boost in the search results from that country (which only makes sense), but .com is a “global” TLD that isn’t associated with any specific country.

    I’ve heard a lot of unsubstantiated claims, a lot of FUD, but I have seen no credible evidence that a .com extension gets any preference in the global search results over sites created on other TLDs, simply as a result of the TLD.

    The main reason to avoid .co if you can get a .com instead is that many people, when typing in the address, will “overshoot the mark” and automatically add the “m” to the end… and potentially end up on someone else’s site. This is one of the problems that lead Overstock.com to pull back from their rebranding as “o.co”, for instance.

    If you design intuitive information architecture, write good content and seek out strong links, you’ll do fine no matter what your TLD.

  • @rshahbaz It probably depends on who owns the .com, how popular their site is, and whether you are both targeting the same keywords. Like if someone has keywordphrase.com and you have keywordphrase.co, so long as the .com site isn’t as good as yours, quality and traffic wise, you could still beat them. I bought the .info for a site that I wanted and it now ranks #1 for the word dofollow which I think is pretty good. 

  • Thank you so much for your help @kristi-hines

    You have clarified all my concerns :-)

    Have a great day…

  • I agree with @dianeaull .com is preferable, but not the end all be all. Like she states the code, content, inbound linking, and social media/marketing combined can work for you.

    I think it’s also important that the domain name be easy to remember and say for us humans, after all we are who your targeting:)

    SEO is all about the combination of techniques, like the ingredients of a great recpie. 

  • @rshahbaz  I have a .biz and I have found it quite easy to rank for my keywords. I don’t think Google cares if it .biz, .info, .org, or .co  The only issue I see for you is the confusion with .co and .com – you could be giving traffic away.

  • @amyhallbiz thank you so much Amy for your help, I really appreciate it. 

    I can see your point regarding .co and .com. 

    But if you are targeting to get most of the traffic from SEO and Social media I guess this effect will be quite less. :-)

  • Personally, I believe the extension is important geographically. Example, I am Canadian and a lot of my sites are .ca because the content is relevant to living in Canada. I have had better success with ranking .ca domain names because of this.

    At one time, where the site was physically located meant something. So a .com domain typically indicated a USA location. Or if you were someone looking to get a good reputation by association, you got a .com domain. So in my opinion, the .com was a “fad” that has pretty much run it’s course. 

    The new fads are.co and .xxx lol

    Regardless of your domain extension, your site content and social media reach are what matters most to Google lately.

    I also liked how Amy pointed out how getting a .co vs a .com domain may give away traffic. If you can’t have both, I wouldn’t do use the .co at all.


Add your voice to the discussion

Existing members: . If you do not have a SME account, .

 
 
Check out the Social Media Marketing Podcast!
Get your ad placed here!

Networking Clubs Leaderboard

Avatar ImageE
Ann at  greenoakAnn
Kapil MudholkarKapil
Avatar ImageChris
Avatar ImageJudith
Avatar ImageLydia
Avatar ImageJameson
KMediaIrelandKMediaIrel
Avatar ImageHarry
Avatar ImageAlexandra
Learn more about the Networking Clubs

Recently Active Members

Van Pappas, CFP®
Profile picture of
Profile picture of
Moin Shaikh
Profile picture of
Sandra Spanish Hairstylist
Profile picture of
Ann at  greenoak
Profile picture of
Profile picture of
Kapil Mudholkar
Profile picture of
Profile picture of
Profile picture of
Profile picture of