<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" ><channel><title>Social Media Examiner | Google+ -vs- Blogging | Topic Replies</title> <atom:link href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/feed/</link> <description>Google+ -vs- Blogging - Forum Topic in the Group Blogging</description> <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:50:23 +0000</pubDate> <generator>http://buddypress.org/?v=1.5.5</generator> <language>en</language> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/#post-36358</guid><title><![CDATA[patricia troyer replied to the forum topic Google+ -vs- Blogging in the club Blogging]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/#post-36358</link> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:40:14 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/stonepeople/" title="patricia troyer" rel="nofollow">patricia troyer</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/" rel="nofollow">Google+ -vs- Blogging</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/" rel="nofollow">Blogging</a> Agree <a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/biznetworkguy/' rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/biznetworkguy/' rel="nofollow">@biznetworkguy</a>, there's more than enough room for both. Their uses are slightly different, and if you don't like writing much blogging probably won't work over the long haul - which it is. Great discussion, guys.</p> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/#post-36275</guid><title><![CDATA[John Davy replied to the forum topic Google+ -vs- Blogging in the club Blogging]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/#post-36275</link> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:09:27 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/biznetworkguy/" title="John Davy" rel="nofollow">John Davy</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/" rel="nofollow">Google+ -vs- Blogging</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/" rel="nofollow">Blogging</a> Room for both and G+ helps on ranking I suspect. The other side is that your blog is exactly that YOURS.. G+ belongs to some rich blokes that run a big search engine.</p> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/#post-36031</guid><title><![CDATA[Don Sturgill replied to the forum topic Google+ -vs- Blogging in the club Blogging]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/#post-36031</link> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:48:05 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/roadturn/" title="Don Sturgill" rel="nofollow">Don Sturgill</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/" rel="nofollow">Google+ -vs- Blogging</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/" rel="nofollow">Blogging</a> Depends on their objectives and needs, Becky. Blogging (gasp) isn't for everyone.</p> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/#post-35638</guid><title><![CDATA[Marilyn Murray replied to the forum topic Google+ -vs- Blogging in the club Blogging]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/#post-35638</link> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:18:58 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/marilynmurray/" title="Marilyn Murray" rel="nofollow">Marilyn Murray</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/" rel="nofollow">Google+ -vs- Blogging</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/" rel="nofollow">Blogging</a> I hope that they don't close down in 2014, I won't worry about it right now, let's put it this way we have 1 whole year to find another&#160;forum or create one of our own,there are lot's of beautiful mind out [&#8230;]</p> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/#post-35593</guid><title><![CDATA[Amy Hall - WordPress Assistant &#38; MailChimp Expert replied to the forum topic Google+ -vs- Blogging in the club Blogging]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/#post-35593</link> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 03:39:53 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/amyhallbiz/" title="Amy Hall - WordPress Assistant &#038; MailChimp Expert" rel="nofollow">Amy Hall - WordPress Assistant &#038; MailChimp Expert</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/" rel="nofollow">Google+ -vs- Blogging</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/" rel="nofollow">Blogging</a> <a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/beckyflansburg/' rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/beckyflansburg/' rel="nofollow">@beckyflansburg</a>&#160; I'm going to do this myself. I just signed up to be a Mary Kay rep (I know, I know, but the health insurance is great and inexpensive!) Mary Kay doesn't allow their Independent Beauty [&#8230;]</p> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/#post-35579</guid><title><![CDATA[Mac replied to the forum topic Google+ -vs- Blogging in the club Blogging]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/#post-35579</link> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 23:09:49 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/richardmclaughlin/" title="Mac" rel="nofollow">Mac</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/" rel="nofollow">Google+ -vs- Blogging</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/" rel="nofollow">Blogging</a> have to agree with&#160; <a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/kristi-hines/' rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/kristi-hines/' rel="nofollow">@kristi-hines</a> - trusting &#160;anyone else is bad news.</p> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/#post-35566</guid><title><![CDATA[Kristi Hines replied to the forum topic Google+ -vs- Blogging in the club Blogging]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/#post-35566</link> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:44:32 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/kristi-hines/" title="Kristi Hines" rel="nofollow">Kristi Hines</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/" rel="nofollow">Google+ -vs- Blogging</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/" rel="nofollow">Blogging</a> <a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/beckyflansburg/' rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/beckyflansburg/' rel="nofollow">@beckyflansburg</a> With the way Google eventually shuts down their products, definitely a bad move. &#160;If your client has a blog on their own website, they don't have to worry about anyone closing down their content. [&#8230;]</p> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/#post-35536</guid><title><![CDATA[Dionysius Lee replied to the forum topic Google+ -vs- Blogging in the club Blogging]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/#post-35536</link> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:24:15 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/dionysius/" title="Dionysius Lee" rel="nofollow">Dionysius Lee</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/" rel="nofollow">Google+ -vs- Blogging</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/" rel="nofollow">Blogging</a> Bad choice. &#160;If you are not on a Wordpress Blog, you missed out on all the wonderful plugins. &#160;It may or may not be the case in future, but for now Google+ is not mature enough. &#160;Unless of course your clients [&#8230;]</p> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/#post-35531</guid><title><![CDATA[Dewane Mutunga replied to the forum topic Google+ -vs- Blogging in the club Blogging]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/#post-35531</link> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/mutunga/" title="Dewane Mutunga" rel="nofollow">Dewane Mutunga</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/" rel="nofollow">Google+ -vs- Blogging</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/" rel="nofollow">Blogging</a> <a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/beckyflansburg/' rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/beckyflansburg/' rel="nofollow">@beckyflansburg</a><div></div><div>Your clients are making a huge mistake. You own your blog, it's your central hub. You have no control over Google +.</div> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/#post-35454</guid><title><![CDATA[Erik Deckers replied to the forum topic Google+ -vs- Blogging in the club Blogging]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/#post-35454</link> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 12:21:07 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/erikdeckers/" title="Erik Deckers" rel="nofollow">Erik Deckers</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/google-vs-blogging-1/" rel="nofollow">Google+ -vs- Blogging</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/" rel="nofollow">Blogging</a> Bad move. A blog is universal. Not everyone is on Google+, or wants to be, which means they could be missing out on valuable readers and clients. Also, I don't see a lot of Google+ content showing up on Google [&#8230;]</p> ]]> </description> </item> </channel> </rss>