<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" ><channel><title>Social Media Examiner | Aggravated at G+ | Topic Replies</title> <atom:link href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/feed/</link> <description>Aggravated at G+ - Forum Topic in the Group Blogging</description> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:57:15 +0000</pubDate> <generator>http://buddypress.org/?v=1.5.5</generator> <language>en</language> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/#post-50218</guid><title><![CDATA[Alice Ly replied to the forum topic Aggravated at G+ in the club Blogging]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/#post-50218</link> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:16:34 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/alice-ly/" title="Alice Ly" rel="nofollow">Alice Ly</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/" rel="nofollow">Aggravated at G+</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/" rel="nofollow">Blogging</a> Glad to hear your issue got fixed! They (any big company) usually don't tell you the exact reason why you get suspended. Which is counter-intuitive, especially when you need to know why in order NOT to do it [&#8230;]</p> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/#post-50198</guid><title><![CDATA[Wade Harman replied to the forum topic Aggravated at G+ in the club Blogging]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/#post-50198</link> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:47:38 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/wade-harman/" title="Wade Harman" rel="nofollow">Wade Harman</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/" rel="nofollow">Aggravated at G+</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/" rel="nofollow">Blogging</a> @Robin-Carlisle No they did not give any indication as to why I kept getting suspended. &#160;All I can think of is this: &#160;<div></div><div>When you share to Google Plus you have the option to share to your circles, public, etc. &#160;I was [&#8230;]</div> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/#post-50197</guid><title><![CDATA[Robin Carlisle replied to the forum topic Aggravated at G+ in the club Blogging]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/#post-50197</link> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:17:18 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/atlantarobin/" title="Robin Carlisle" rel="nofollow">Robin Carlisle</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/" rel="nofollow">Aggravated at G+</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/" rel="nofollow">Blogging</a> <a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/wade-harman/' rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/wade-harman/' rel="nofollow">@wade-harman</a>Wade, did they say why? Did someone in your circles complain or red flag you? What's the difference in sharing to Public and Your Circles? I know I usually just click yes to whatever pops up. So what [&#8230;]</p> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/#post-50177</guid><title><![CDATA[Frank Gainsford replied to the forum topic Aggravated at G+ in the club Blogging]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/#post-50177</link> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 07:17:11 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/frank-gainsford/" title="Frank Gainsford" rel="nofollow">Frank Gainsford</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/" rel="nofollow">Aggravated at G+</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/" rel="nofollow">Blogging</a> Great to hear you soved your issue...</p> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/#post-50171</guid><title><![CDATA[Wade Harman replied to the forum topic Aggravated at G+ in the club Blogging]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/#post-50171</link> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 20:32:06 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/wade-harman/" title="Wade Harman" rel="nofollow">Wade Harman</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/" rel="nofollow">Aggravated at G+</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/" rel="nofollow">Blogging</a> Well, I think I got it under control now. &#160;I finally got Google to confirm my site and I have got the whole rules of sharing under control. &#160;Seems as though when you share you should share to "Public" and not [&#8230;]</p> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/#post-50150</guid><title><![CDATA[Robin Carlisle replied to the forum topic Aggravated at G+ in the club Blogging]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/#post-50150</link> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 15:10:12 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/atlantarobin/" title="Robin Carlisle" rel="nofollow">Robin Carlisle</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/" rel="nofollow">Aggravated at G+</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/" rel="nofollow">Blogging</a> Wade, sometimes people may flag you as spamming... as 10-15 of anything a day "sounds" like spam, even if everyone else gets away with it... and after a certain number red flag you, you just get banned.&#160;<div></div><div>You also [&#8230;]</div> ]]> </description> </item> <item> <guid>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/#post-49923</guid><title><![CDATA[Kristi Hines replied to the forum topic Aggravated at G+ in the club Blogging]]></title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/#post-49923</link> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:54:38 +0000</pubDate><description> <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/kristi-hines/" title="Kristi Hines" rel="nofollow">Kristi Hines</a> replied to the forum topic <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/forum/topic/aggravated-at-g/" rel="nofollow">Aggravated at G+</a> in the club <a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/clubs/blogging/" rel="nofollow">Blogging</a> <a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/wade-harman/' rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/members/wade-harman/' rel="nofollow">@wade-harman</a> That's weird... I haven't heard of anyone who is repeatedly getting deleted. I only post a few times a week there, but I know of plenty of people who post more often daily (like Guy Kawasaki who [&#8230;]</p> ]]> </description> </item> </channel> </rss>